In a new filing with the Federal Communications Commission published on their MobilizeEverything site yesterday, AT&T lists the reasons behind the intended acquisition of Deutsche Telekom’s T-Mobile USA business for $39 billion. The filing also sheds some light on AT&T’s often criticized network performance. According the one time and aspiring monopolist, the primary reason to buy T-Mobile USA was an astounding rise in traffic blamed on data-hungry smartphones and tablets. It specifically mentions the iPad while alluding to the iPhone:

The period between 2007 to 2010 when AT&T experienced an 8,000 percent rise in mobile data volumes likely refers to the iPhone, which debuted in the summer of 2007. Read on…

AT&T contends that unless it buys another carrier that would improve their network capacity, its network won’t be able to accommodate the growing appetite of data-enabled smartphones and tablets because capital expenditures would be too high and the expansion would take too much time.  Yes, the $39B they are paying for T-Mobile couldn’t be used for building up their network.

Illustrating their point, the carrier wrote that data traffic on its network in the first five to seven weeks of 2015 is expected to match the whole of 2010. Consumers will benefit from the “reduced number of dropped and blocked calls, increasing data speeds, improving in-building coverage, and dramatically expanding deployment of next-generation mobile technology,” the filing reads.

Sprint is officially opposing the transaction and is demanding the government step in, arguing the acquisition would create a duopoly which would raise both the barrier to entry for other players and the prices users pay for wireless services.

  • AT&T activates 3.6 million iPhones in first quarter (9to5mac.com)
  • AT&T-Mobile: AT&T just bought T-Mobile USA (9to5mac.com)
  • AT&T to add free 2GB to tethering plans (9to5mac.com)
  • AT&T iPhone 4 beats AT&T ‘4G’ Android upload speed (9to5mac.com)
  • Sprint officially opposing AT&T/T-Mobile deal, urges government to intervene (9to5mac.com)